Skip to main content

A “Sermon by a Boy” for the meeting of the brothers of the Little Oratory

My dear brothers; this afternoon it seemed appropriate to speak on a topic I have been looking into during this liturgical period where we meditate upon the four last things. In recent reading, I was introduced to a position I was previously unfamiliar with on the topic of the fires of damnation and purgatory. A position which attempts to understand these fires as the divine love.

The initial thought many of you may have is the same as the first thought that I myself had. How could the tormenting fire of hell and the purifying fire of purgatory be divine love? For is it not divine love which the saints enjoy in the beatific vision? How could this same love be that which torments the damned and which purifies the not yet beatified? An old maxim of the Theologians appears to be relevant here. “That which is received is received according to the mode of the receiver”. The damned receive this perfect and infinite love as torment because they reject it. The souls undergoing their purification in purgatory receive this love as the purifying fire by which they are prepared for the eternal ecstasy of beholding the ineffable face to face.

                The symbolism of the presence of God as fire has much history within both Scripture and Tradition. In Exodus, God is the pillar of fire which guided Israel in the wilderness. In the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles at Pentecost as if fire. In Hebrews, God is identified as a consuming fire (Heb 12:29). We find in great luminaries of Catholic tradition the understanding of the divine love as fire. From Augustine, St Catherine of Siena, St Padre Pio, St Gemma Galgani, St John of the Cross, and St Therese of Lisieux all seem in invoke this imagery in various places within their work or prayers attributed to them.

                I suppose the most pertinent question to offering this suggestion to you, my brothers, is the question as to whether it is at all possible that love could be received as torment. Let us begin with what is more known to us, to move to what is less known. Could the love of a parent or a friend be received by the recipient as negative or tormenting? Take the example of a teenager rebelling against their parent’s boundaries and rules and by this has fallen into an unsavory crowd. The child’s parents impose a curfew, forbid them from seeing their new “friends”, and closely monitor them. They do this as an act of love. However, would it not be true to say that the child would receive these actions as tormenting? An imposition of the parents upon one of the golden calves of modernity, “autonomy”. Whilst amongst friends, do not moral and intellectual criticism and critique sometimes be received as not an act of love but one of hatred?  The answer to both of these questions appears in the affirmative. So, could the same not be true for the infinite and perfect love of God?

                It is my suggestion brothers, one which I believe has sufficient warrant in the tradition even though it lacks firm theological proof, that we ought to understand the eternal fire of hell and the purifying fire of Purgatory as divine love. The reprobate suffers torment from this love because they have deliberately rejected love, but as it is gratuitously given by God, who can never cease to love his creature, they suffer it as torment proportionate to their wretched guilt which has condemned them. The faithful undergoing purification receives this same fire, this all-consuming love, as the purification of their soul in order to prepare themselves for true intimacy with the divine for all eternity. Finally, the saints receive this same love as the ultimate and perfect union between creature and creator. Damnation, purification, and deification are not three separate acts of God, but they are one act. The same act of love which deifies the saints purifies the Church suffering in preparation for deification and torments the damned in proportion to their guilt.


                Peace be with you, my brothers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I became and remain Catholic.

Easter 2010 was a particularly momentous occasion in my life, I was formally received into the Catholic Church; receiving the Grace of Love, that is the Holy Spirit, through my first Sacramental Reconciliation; was sealed by the infusion of grace through Confirmation; and finally made communion with the Universal Church in my first reception of Our Lord in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar. I have noticed a growing trend on Catholic Social Media and Blogosphere in response to the purported loss of Catholics to the ‘unaffiliated’—I shall endeavour to say more about this notion of an unaffiliated religious belief in another post—group in the USA in which practicing Catholics give reasons for why they are Catholic.                 Firstly, a little about myself. I am a 22 year old practicing Catholic, who has recently graduated University with a BA (Hons) Philosophy and Theology with the ultimate aim of bei...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sola Scriptura, Solo Scriptura, & Ecclesial Anarchy; Against the Doctrine of Sola Scriptura. Author; Clay Whittleberry.

So, the following post will be a repeat of much of what I’ve already said in the past about Sola Scriptura. I would like to revisit the argument claiming that Sola Scriptura is Solo Scriptura, and then look at some of the implications that has. So, as I have referred to before, Keith Mathison wrote a book entitled The Shape of Sola Scriptura. Within that book he argued that Protestants were giving up the classical Reformation doctrine Sola Scriptura for the novelty Solo Scriptura. Sola Scriptura states that Scripture is our sole infallible authority on matters of faith and practice. Solo Scriptura states that Scripture is our sole authority on matters of faith and practice. The former allows for secondary fallible authorities. The latter does not. Bryan Cross and Neal Judisch argued that there is no principled difference between the two in a blog post they co-wrote at Called to Communion in 2009. I’ll summarize the argument here. Sola Scriptura sets Scripture up as our sole in...
Post a Comment
Read more

On the relation of Faith and Reason in the Doctrine of Creation; a preliminary analysis.

  " If anyone says that human reason is so independent that faith cannot be enjoined upon it by God, let him be anathema ... If anyone says that divine revelation cannot be made credible by outward signs and that, therefore, men ought to be moved to faith solely by each one's inner experience or by personal inspiration, let him be anathema." The First Ecumenical Council at the Vatican.   A post authored by a friend of mine recently turned up on my news feed on a subject that I have discussed much about privately. This issue is not so hotly discussed and debated in the United Kingdom as it is in the United States, but some clarity would of course be helpful. If it was not clear from the title of this post; the topic is that of Creationism vs. Intelligent Design vs. Evolution, where do we stand as the Faithful of the Holy Mother Church? Explicit in the dogmatic canons there is no specific position taken, implicitly though there do appear to be some problems that need to be...
Post a Comment
Read more